There is some truth in that

Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa's blog

Sunday, December 27, 2009

What is purism? What are epistemic standards?

›
I'm reading Fantl and McGrath's new knowledge book. An important thesis of the book is that of  Impurism . Impurism is defined in ch...
1 comment:
Monday, December 07, 2009

Review of DeRose's Case for Contextualism

›
Here is a draft of a review of Keith DeRose's new book. Comments welcome.
3 comments:
Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Experimental Philosophy and Apriority

›
I've just written up an abstract for a paper I'm thinking about writing on the bearing of x-phi on the alleged apriority of philosop...
Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Contextualism, Intellectualism, and Ignorant Third Persons

›
It's a little bit natural to think that 'knows' contextualism and the shifty kind of invariantist that's sometimes called an...
2 comments:
Monday, November 23, 2009

Asserting Kp v p

›
Keith DeRose accepts something like the knowledge norm of assertion -- although as a contextualist, he can't have it entirely straightfo...
3 comments:
Thursday, November 19, 2009

What is infallibility supposed to be?

›
This week I'm thinking about Laurence Bonjour's In Defense of Pure Reason . In §4.4, Bonjour offers what he takes to be a very strai...
4 comments:
Monday, November 16, 2009

Could there be Reductive Knowledge First?

›
Timothy Williamson has famously defended these two claims: (1) Knowledge cannot be analyzed (2) Knowledge can play lots of important explana...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.